<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Private Man</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theprivateman.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Online Dating, Relationships, Men&#039;s Issues (look up to see pages)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why No Chivalry When Dating? by Ton</title>
		<link>http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/why-no-chivalry-when-dating/#comment-20888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/?p=2609#comment-20888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are no 22 year old platoon sergeants. Not even in SpecOps.... Nit picking for sure on an otherwise good post. It&#039;s funny but after 24 years on the line, I&#039;m immune to rain and what not. Chicks dig it. Sauntering through a down poor to pull the truck around gets em all lubed up.

What I&#039;ll do for the woman I hope to see naked/ am seeing naked is not extended to women at large. #1, they&#039;ve earned no such privileges # 2 it makes the girl your out with feel extra special. 

And that applies to all manner of things. I am not going to let random chick on my motorcycle, or move something heavy for her etc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no 22 year old platoon sergeants. Not even in SpecOps&#8230;. Nit picking for sure on an otherwise good post. It&#8217;s funny but after 24 years on the line, I&#8217;m immune to rain and what not. Chicks dig it. Sauntering through a down poor to pull the truck around gets em all lubed up.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;ll do for the woman I hope to see naked/ am seeing naked is not extended to women at large. #1, they&#8217;ve earned no such privileges # 2 it makes the girl your out with feel extra special. </p>
<p>And that applies to all manner of things. I am not going to let random chick on my motorcycle, or move something heavy for her etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why No Chivalry When Dating? by just visiting</title>
		<link>http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/why-no-chivalry-when-dating/#comment-20881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[just visiting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 20:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/?p=2609#comment-20881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And, unless you&#039;ve got the alpha basics down, don&#039;t attempt it.  It has to come from a place of strength . It&#039;s about the standards he has for himself. It&#039;s never about supplication or appeasement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, unless you&#8217;ve got the alpha basics down, don&#8217;t attempt it.  It has to come from a place of strength . It&#8217;s about the standards he has for himself. It&#8217;s never about supplication or appeasement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why No Chivalry When Dating? by just visiting</title>
		<link>http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/why-no-chivalry-when-dating/#comment-20879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[just visiting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/?p=2609#comment-20879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not about being nice. That&#039;s where men get into trouble with the supplication thing. It&#039;s not about her. It&#039;s about the man and his code. It&#039;s happening whether she wants it or not because it isn&#039;t her call. She doesn&#039;t control it and it isn&#039;t about her And she isn&#039;t the only one that it&#039;s directed at, which can be easily demonstrated. It&#039;s outcome independant because it was never about her. It&#039;s about him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not about being nice. That&#8217;s where men get into trouble with the supplication thing. It&#8217;s not about her. It&#8217;s about the man and his code. It&#8217;s happening whether she wants it or not because it isn&#8217;t her call. She doesn&#8217;t control it and it isn&#8217;t about her And she isn&#8217;t the only one that it&#8217;s directed at, which can be easily demonstrated. It&#8217;s outcome independant because it was never about her. It&#8217;s about him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Manosphere Is Evolving by TERRENCE POPP</title>
		<link>http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/2012/11/14/the-manosphere-is-evolving/#comment-20870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TERRENCE POPP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/?p=2251#comment-20870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtSOb_ee2a8

I HOPE YOU LIKE IT REDONKULAS.COM]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='600' height='368' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/OtSOb_ee2a8?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
<p>I HOPE YOU LIKE IT REDONKULAS.COM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why No Chivalry When Dating? by BuenaVista</title>
		<link>http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/why-no-chivalry-when-dating/#comment-20866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BuenaVista]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/?p=2609#comment-20866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I&#039;m disinterested in historical definitions of chivalry, in part because I read medieval literature in the original Middle English, and prefer not to be schooled on such a pedantic note on a men&#039;s blog.  Whatever.  Perhaps what I am just interested in a set of behaviors, and a commitment to manners, that appear to be very attractive to women who select for strong and confident men.  Example below.  I believe many would call this particular action &quot;chivalric&quot;.  I call it being a gentleman.  

Last night I had a first date (just drinks) and after drinks prepared to leave the bar.  There was a nasty thunderstorm in full bore, raining buckets.  Five women were by the front door, quite well-dressed, and my date started to remove her shoes saying she would run to her car.  I was looking at all these women in their finery and thinking, This is going to be a very attractive scene once they are soaked to the skin.  But, I refocused.  The women are yapping with my date.  Without a word, I handed my date my jacket and then said simply I&#039;ll go get my car, be right back, and then I booked.  I believe this is the sort of thing the PUAs are always sneering at as supplicating misplaced chivalry blah blah.  I regarded it as solving the problem at hand.

The five women *applauded* as I ran out the door.  I returned, my date got in my car, still barefoot.  We drove to her car.  Her hand was inside my jeans in five minutes.  And she removed her jeans without prompting in less than ten minutes.  True.  She was wearing magic clothes:  the kind that fall off all by themselves.  

I don&#039;t think this is an age thing.  There are 22 year-old platoon sergeants in Afghanistan; they&#039;re not going to turn into betas because they jog through rain so their girlfriend doesn&#039;t have to.  My take is just do what you think is right, and if that&#039;s opening the door, don&#039;t look like you&#039;re asking permission first and expecting a cookie afterward.  Don&#039;t talk about it, don&#039;t be contrived, don&#039;t peacock.  Open the fucking door and put your hand on her shoulder and direct her through.  These days I am somewhat arrogant about my manners; they&#039;re getting them whether or not they want them. She is out with *me*, and *I* am taking care of *her.*  Inevitably, someone new brings up something like, &quot;You&#039;re awfully bossy (or some other femme word for alpha)&quot;.  Educated women are so used to feminized men they are nearly disoriented by manners and male direction.  I reply, &quot;You prefer submissive?&quot;.  And half of the time, right there, we know where things are going to end up.   Only the pyscho self-sabotagers seem to mind, and I suspect they mind because it just makes a man *more* attractive to them (and their agenda is to prove to themselves no one is good enough, they can&#039;t be happy, attractive men are dogs, or something).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;m disinterested in historical definitions of chivalry, in part because I read medieval literature in the original Middle English, and prefer not to be schooled on such a pedantic note on a men&#8217;s blog.  Whatever.  Perhaps what I am just interested in a set of behaviors, and a commitment to manners, that appear to be very attractive to women who select for strong and confident men.  Example below.  I believe many would call this particular action &#8220;chivalric&#8221;.  I call it being a gentleman.  </p>
<p>Last night I had a first date (just drinks) and after drinks prepared to leave the bar.  There was a nasty thunderstorm in full bore, raining buckets.  Five women were by the front door, quite well-dressed, and my date started to remove her shoes saying she would run to her car.  I was looking at all these women in their finery and thinking, This is going to be a very attractive scene once they are soaked to the skin.  But, I refocused.  The women are yapping with my date.  Without a word, I handed my date my jacket and then said simply I&#8217;ll go get my car, be right back, and then I booked.  I believe this is the sort of thing the PUAs are always sneering at as supplicating misplaced chivalry blah blah.  I regarded it as solving the problem at hand.</p>
<p>The five women *applauded* as I ran out the door.  I returned, my date got in my car, still barefoot.  We drove to her car.  Her hand was inside my jeans in five minutes.  And she removed her jeans without prompting in less than ten minutes.  True.  She was wearing magic clothes:  the kind that fall off all by themselves.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this is an age thing.  There are 22 year-old platoon sergeants in Afghanistan; they&#8217;re not going to turn into betas because they jog through rain so their girlfriend doesn&#8217;t have to.  My take is just do what you think is right, and if that&#8217;s opening the door, don&#8217;t look like you&#8217;re asking permission first and expecting a cookie afterward.  Don&#8217;t talk about it, don&#8217;t be contrived, don&#8217;t peacock.  Open the fucking door and put your hand on her shoulder and direct her through.  These days I am somewhat arrogant about my manners; they&#8217;re getting them whether or not they want them. She is out with *me*, and *I* am taking care of *her.*  Inevitably, someone new brings up something like, &#8220;You&#8217;re awfully bossy (or some other femme word for alpha)&#8221;.  Educated women are so used to feminized men they are nearly disoriented by manners and male direction.  I reply, &#8220;You prefer submissive?&#8221;.  And half of the time, right there, we know where things are going to end up.   Only the pyscho self-sabotagers seem to mind, and I suspect they mind because it just makes a man *more* attractive to them (and their agenda is to prove to themselves no one is good enough, they can&#8217;t be happy, attractive men are dogs, or something).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why No Chivalry When Dating? by LostSailor</title>
		<link>http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/why-no-chivalry-when-dating/#comment-20857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LostSailor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/?p=2609#comment-20857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;if you would do it for a man, it’s courtesy. if you wouldn’t do it for another man, it’s chivalry.&lt;/em&gt;

While, yes, there is a specific definition of Chivalry as a medieval warriors code, the formal idea of Chivalry changed greatly over the centuries and by the late middle ages had taken on the form as most people think of it today, an aristocratic model of conduct, customs, and manners, that persisted in ever weakening form up until it was finally reduced to near-meaninglessness after World War I. I guess impersonal mass slaughter finally taught men that being &quot;chivalrous&quot; and &quot;gallant&quot; is a good way to get yourself killed for little gain. 

And it mostly was an aristocratic/upper-class thing. The behavior of men on the Titanic is a good example. Most (though by no means all) of the First Class men went along with the whole &quot;women and children&quot; first thing for this reason. Studies of the survival rates of men and women in shipwrecks historically has shown that in most cases, men had much higher survival rates; when it&#039;s life and death, most of the guys will run you down to get to that lifeboat, ladies. 

What most women mean by chivalry today is really nothing more than common courtesy that&#039;s unfortunately become anything but common. So I agree with socal83&#039;s definition. As a rule, I generally don&#039;t extend any courtesies toward women that I wouldn&#039;t extend for a man, with the possible exception of giving my seat on the subway up for a pregnant woman. The really fat guy that looks like he&#039;s about to keep over is on his own...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>if you would do it for a man, it’s courtesy. if you wouldn’t do it for another man, it’s chivalry.</em></p>
<p>While, yes, there is a specific definition of Chivalry as a medieval warriors code, the formal idea of Chivalry changed greatly over the centuries and by the late middle ages had taken on the form as most people think of it today, an aristocratic model of conduct, customs, and manners, that persisted in ever weakening form up until it was finally reduced to near-meaninglessness after World War I. I guess impersonal mass slaughter finally taught men that being &#8220;chivalrous&#8221; and &#8220;gallant&#8221; is a good way to get yourself killed for little gain. </p>
<p>And it mostly was an aristocratic/upper-class thing. The behavior of men on the Titanic is a good example. Most (though by no means all) of the First Class men went along with the whole &#8220;women and children&#8221; first thing for this reason. Studies of the survival rates of men and women in shipwrecks historically has shown that in most cases, men had much higher survival rates; when it&#8217;s life and death, most of the guys will run you down to get to that lifeboat, ladies. </p>
<p>What most women mean by chivalry today is really nothing more than common courtesy that&#8217;s unfortunately become anything but common. So I agree with socal83&#8242;s definition. As a rule, I generally don&#8217;t extend any courtesies toward women that I wouldn&#8217;t extend for a man, with the possible exception of giving my seat on the subway up for a pregnant woman. The really fat guy that looks like he&#8217;s about to keep over is on his own&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why No Chivalry When Dating? by BuenaVista</title>
		<link>http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/why-no-chivalry-when-dating/#comment-20856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BuenaVista]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/?p=2609#comment-20856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m curious.  How many times are you going to say the same thing?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious.  How many times are you going to say the same thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Generation Spinster by terrence popp</title>
		<link>http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/generation-spinster/#comment-20853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[terrence popp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/?p=1765#comment-20853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CHECK OUT REDONKULAS.COM  FUNNY STUFF THERE]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHECK OUT REDONKULAS.COM  FUNNY STUFF THERE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why No Chivalry When Dating? by Ton</title>
		<link>http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/why-no-chivalry-when-dating/#comment-20837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/?p=2609#comment-20837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read the book of chivalry written by a French knight in the late 1200&#039;s. I &#039;re read it every year or so. It&#039;s a system of ranking honorable action among fighting men and hardly mentions women. Says nothing about opening doors or standing up when they enter a room

http://www.amazon.com/Book-Chivalry-Geoffroi-Charny-Translation/dp/0812215796]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the book of chivalry written by a French knight in the late 1200&#8242;s. I &#8216;re read it every year or so. It&#8217;s a system of ranking honorable action among fighting men and hardly mentions women. Says nothing about opening doors or standing up when they enter a room</p>
<div style="width: 353px; text-align: center; background: #fff; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin: 3px; padding: 2px;">
<p style="margin: 10px 10px;"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Book-Chivalry-Geoffroi-Charny-Translation/dp/0812215796" target="_blank"><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51pUcwVjh4L.jpg" height="500" width="333" alt="The Book of Chivalry of Geoffroi de Charny: Text, Context, and Translation (The Middle Ages Series)" style="padding:0;margin:0;border:none;" /></a></p>
<p style="font-size: 10px;"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Book-Chivalry-Geoffroi-Charny-Translation/dp/0812215796" target="_blank">The Book of Chivalry of Geoffroi de Charny: Text, Context, and Translation (The Middle Ages Series)</a></p>
<p style="font-size: 10px;">
<p style="margin: 10px 131.5px;"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Book-Chivalry-Geoffroi-Charny-Translation/dp/0812215796" target="_blank"><img alt="Buy from Amazon" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/buttons/buy-from-tan.gif"" style="padding:0;margin:0;border:none;" /></a></p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why No Chivalry When Dating? by Benton</title>
		<link>http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/why-no-chivalry-when-dating/#comment-20836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateman.wordpress.com/?p=2609#comment-20836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best advice I learned from the manosphere was &quot;women describe the qualities they want in a man that they are already attracted too.&quot;  The characteristics they describe- chivalry, being supportive or &quot;nice,&quot; will do nothing to create attraction and can only lead to you being exploited.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best advice I learned from the manosphere was &#8220;women describe the qualities they want in a man that they are already attracted too.&#8221;  The characteristics they describe- chivalry, being supportive or &#8220;nice,&#8221; will do nothing to create attraction and can only lead to you being exploited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>