From A Reader

I sometimes get amazing correspondence from my readers. Here is something from a woman about the nature of women. I’ve done some minor editing to make it a bit more readable.

I’m unfamiliar with this site. But the page on domineering women struck a nerve. As a battle-scarred woman, let me tell you about the three most domineering women I’ve ever known. I’m talking the ultimate, supreme, unrivaled, gold standards. Two of whom I’ve known since youth. The third I worked with for just two years but who scarred me badly.

The first two are rough, crude, battle-axe types who are so insufferable they eventually drive away everyone, including their husbands, who were so fed up that they both got out of control sexually and had numerous affairs (think Bill Clinton and his battle-axe). Now each of the women are raising three kids on their own. They have mostly themselves to blame.

The third was most dangerous. Unlike the others, she is well educated, refined, sophisticated, and who came across as lady-like. Upon first meeting her, no one would ever suspect that they were looking into the eyes of a lying, scheming, domineering, manipulative, self-serving, back-stabbing, greedy little witch. One who got ahead by shamelessly undermining those around her, one by one: male, female, young, old, higher ups and support staff alike. Sometimes it was subtle. Other times she would throw tantrums and tattle on people.

Perhaps, tellingly, the one she treated most viciously and unfairly was a beautiful young blonde woman. For the existence of beautiful women (as opposed to her plain Jane self) was an affront to her smug sense of superiority. That she would never consider herself dishonest or unethical was most outrageous. Everyone else she expected to toe the line. Otherwise she would nail them and squash them like a bug. If this were the behavior of a soap opera villainess it would be amusing. But in reality it’s truly disturbing.

Years later I actually saw her on the tv news, in a segment on working women with stay-at-home husbands. Not a surprise given that a) she’s narcissistic enough to seek publicity; and b) the poor shmuck is now totally under her control. Let’s see how long he lasts.

In conclusion, for me it took time, experience, and helpful insights by good folk like those on this site to piece it all together and see behind the curtain. God bless us everyone.

About these ads
  1. #1 by Bob Wallace on December 13, 2013 - 9:57 PM

    She nailed it: narcissist. Who knows? Borderline? Perhaps psychopath?

  2. #2 by earl on December 14, 2013 - 9:32 AM

    Heh…once again proves the worst misogynists are women.

    • #3 by Kingsley on December 14, 2013 - 4:47 PM

      Exactly!! What’s more misogynistic than a women emulating a man to succeed because been feminine is deemed weak in her mind.

  3. #4 by michaelseville on December 14, 2013 - 10:33 AM

  4. #5 by angelwanderer on December 14, 2013 - 6:23 PM

    They are worse than men. The psychological scars they leave on others are not just invisible but insidious- A (www.angelwanderer.wordpress.com)

  5. #6 by vivien on December 15, 2013 - 5:12 AM

    Oh, and one more thing. She spent all day making personal calls. “Work” was just something she squeezed in between.

    Thanks guys :)

  6. #7 by infowarrior1 on December 15, 2013 - 6:19 AM

    Now how do we crush them?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,500 other followers

%d bloggers like this: